it corroborates the brand new prosecutrix’s (PW2) testimony that Accused had sexual intercourse with her and you can pressed her to help you bring his cock

See: James compared to Condition from Lagos (2021) LPELR-52456 (CA); Eze vs State (2019) LPELR-47984 (CA); Aje versus Condition (2019) LPELR-46828 (CA). Including corroboration need to be reputable, outside and you can independent of the https://brightwomen.net/tr/malt-kadin/ testimony of your child. The data of all of the witnesses of your prosecution one supposedly substantiated new testimony regarding PW2 was indeed all the based on PW2 by herself. Also, eg corroboration shouldn’t only signify the newest offense are enough time it will reveal that the fresh Offender indeed the amount of time brand new offense. The brand new prosecution’s case are bereft of any cogent as well as legitimate independent corroborative proof. Surface Thirty-Five New Honourable All the way down Courtroom erred in-law while in counting with the proof of PWI, they stored one: “…

In-law, an oral confession can be as potent since an authored confession. It is an article of direct and you may convictable research… The new Appellant was not charged to be an excellent sex addict. Because of the provision of your own Research Work a beneficial confession was an enthusiastic entry from men in person. It is a statement made by a person charged with a good unlawful offense. See: Uluebeka compared to State (2000) LPELR-3354 (SC). The fresh testimony otherwise proof PW1 against the Appellant could not compensate an effective confession contrary to the Appellant. Surface 30-Five The brand new Honourable All the way down Judge erred in-law from inside the relying on usage of circumstantial proof on commitment of age of PW2 and you may thereby wrongly determined that PW2 are an infant just like the in the time of your so-called offense. Continue reading She told you new Defendant verified he was a good sex fan