The fresh new survey contains 3 parts. Region We included inquiries away from socio-demographic investigation (many years, amount of degree, parity, familial income, career, current marital standing, sexual hobby, reputation of HPV inoculation, and you will history of unusual cervical malignant tumors testing).

Part II composed of 6 questions about the prospective ladies who should be screened, age first off, frequency, decades otherwise criteria to prevent away from testing, and techniques out of evaluating. Only the people who’d ever heard regarding HPV perform proceed to help you Area III which reviewed information about HPV regarding the particular (oncogenic or low-oncogenic), function out-of alert and you can reduction.

Before the investigation, new survey out-of area II and part III within the Thai type was in fact considered, talked about, and modified up to consensus one of 20 boffins have been the gynecologic oncologists (specific was basically writers various other parallel training). The pros rated each of 19 concerns because the sometimes ‘relevant’ otherwise ‘not relevant’. The thing-peak Stuff Authenticity List (I-CVI) are calculated for every items, as well as the Posts Validity Directory (CVI) was determined by firmly taking an average ratio off 14 questions relating to understanding of cervical disease testing and 5 questions relating to HPV. The new CVI had been step 1 for elements of brand new questionnaire (S1 Dining table). The reliability is actually looked at inside 29 female with similar characteristic just like the members. The brand new Cronbach’ alpha coefficients towards the reliability was indeed 0.819 to possess knowledge about cervical cancer assessment and you may 0.907 to have information about HPV. Continue reading Another type of layer out-of issues asking if or not female was indeed familiar with HPV