The fresh new survey contains 3 parts. Region We included inquiries away from socio-demographic investigation (many years, amount of degree, parity, familial income, career, current marital standing, sexual hobby, reputation of HPV inoculation, and you will history of unusual cervical malignant tumors testing).

Part II composed of 6 questions about the prospective ladies who should be screened, age first off, frequency, decades otherwise criteria to prevent away from testing, and techniques out of evaluating. Only the people who’d ever heard regarding HPV perform proceed to help you Area III which reviewed information about HPV regarding the particular (oncogenic or low-oncogenic), function out-of alert and you can reduction.

Before the investigation, new survey out-of area II and part III within the Thai type was in fact considered, talked about, and modified up to consensus one of 20 boffins have been the gynecologic oncologists (specific was basically writers various other parallel training). The pros rated each of 19 concerns because the sometimes ‘relevant’ otherwise ‘not relevant’. The thing-peak Stuff Authenticity List (I-CVI) are calculated for every items, as well as the Posts Validity Directory (CVI) was determined by firmly taking an average ratio off 14 questions relating to understanding of cervical disease testing and 5 questions relating to HPV. The new CVI had been step 1 for elements of brand new questionnaire (S1 Dining table). The reliability is actually looked at inside 29 female with similar characteristic just like the members. The brand new Cronbach’ alpha coefficients towards the reliability was indeed 0.819 to possess knowledge about cervical cancer assessment and you may 0.907 to have information about HPV.

Studies range

Toward time out-of scheduled colposcopy, the study assistant given pointers of one’s data towards feminine who came across introduction conditions. The women exactly who accessible to engage offered created told agree and you will replied this new survey on their own themselves in advance of proceeding to help you colposcopy.

Investigation compiled because of it investigation was socio-market investigation (Part I of your survey), experience with cervical cancers tests (Region II), and you can expertise in HPV (Region III).

Statistical studies

The latest solutions of knowledge on cervical disease evaluating and you can HPV was indeed analyzed because of the for each product prior to scoring categorization. Best answer is obtained once the step one while ‘completely wrong and you will being unsure of answer’ is obtained 0.

Out-of fourteen concerns regarding cervical disease evaluation, women whoever score were ? ten were arbitrarily categorized since which have ‘a knowledge’ if not was in fact thought to be which have “bad knowledge”. To have experience in HPV, female whose address is actually ‘never ever been aware of HPV’ was indeed omitted on the data away from HPV knowledge.

Of 5 issues, female whose rating had been ? step three was in fact thought to be having ‘an excellent knowledge of HPV’ otherwise while the ‘negative knowledge’. Of 19 concerns, feminine whoever score were ? thirteen have been categorized once the which have ‘a great full knowledge’ or else as ‘negative full knowledge’.

All the data had been accumulated for the an electronic databases and you can assessed playing with SPSS V.twenty six.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chi town, IL, USA). Detailed statistics were used to analyze demographic study and you can have been summarized since the quantity with commission, imply which have fundamental deviation or median that have variety. New relationship anywhere between for every changeable and studies get have been analyzed using simple linear regression. Exploratory model is made in the multivariable investigation plus all details possibly about the knowledge get. This new sensed amount of analytical importance is actually an excellent p-property value 0.05 otherwise shorter.

Abilities

Out of 500 women overlegen side for internationale studerende who met inclusion criteria and were invited to the study, one ong 499 women who responded to the questionnaire about knowledge of cervical cancer and screening (part II) and knowledge about HPV (part II), two did not provide personal information. So demographic data were available in only 497 women (Table 1). The mean age of 497 participants was years (SD ± ). More than half of the participants were aged < 40>