The latest survey contains step three parts. Region We included issues from socio-demographic analysis (ages, quantity of training, parity, familial money, profession, current marital reputation, sexual craft, reputation for HPV vaccination, and history of abnormal cervical disease screening).
Region II comprised of six questions regarding the goal ladies who will likely be screened, age first off, frequency, years otherwise conditions to quit out of screening, and methods regarding screening. Precisely the participants that has have you ever heard from HPV do proceed so you can Part III and this reviewed knowledge about HPV of its method of (oncogenic or non-oncogenic), setting regarding signal and you may avoidance.
Ahead of the studies, the questionnaire off area II and region III for the Thai version was basically contemplated, discussed, and you may changed up until consensus certainly 20 scientists who had been all gynecologic oncologists (particular was in fact article writers various other synchronous education). The professionals ranked each of 19 questions as both ‘relevant’ otherwise ‘maybe not relevant’. The item-level Blogs Authenticity List (I-CVI) is actually Brug et weblink calculated each item, therefore the Posts Validity Index (CVI) is actually calculated by firmly taking an average ratio regarding fourteen questions regarding knowledge about cervical cancer evaluation and you can 5 questions relating to HPV. New CVI was 1 both for parts of new survey (S1 Dining table). The fresh accuracy are examined for the 31 feminine with similar feature because the people. The Cronbach’ leader coefficients on precision was indeed 0.819 to have understanding of cervical cancer tumors evaluation and you may 0.907 to own information about HPV.
Data collection
With the go out out-of planned colposcopy, the research assistant provided advice of the data to the female just who satisfied inclusion requirements. The ladies which offered to participate gave written advised concur and you may answered the latest survey alone themselves in advance of proceeding so you’re able to colposcopy.
Research built-up for it study were socio-group analysis (Area We of your survey), expertise in cervical disease assessment (Region II), and expertise in HPV (Part III).
Analytical studies
The fresh answers of knowledge regarding cervical cancer tests and you may HPV had been reviewed because of the for every product ahead of scoring categorization. Correct respond to are obtained as 1 whereas ‘incorrect and you will unsure answer’ was scored 0.
Out of 14 concerns out of cervical cancer assessment, female whoever rating was indeed ? 10 was basically randomly categorized since the with ‘a knowledge’ normally was indeed thought to be having “bad education”. To own experience in HPV, women whoever answer try ‘never ever observed HPV’ have been omitted about study away from HPV knowledge.
Away from 5 questions, women whose score was indeed ? step three had been considered as which have ‘a beneficial experience with HPV’ if not because the ‘not-good knowledge’. Out of 19 questions, feminine whoever score was indeed ? 13 were categorized once the that have ‘good total knowledge’ otherwise as the ‘bad overall knowledge’.
All the research had been obtained within the an electronic digital databases and you will reviewed having fun with SPSS V.twenty-six.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Descriptive statistics were utilized to analyze group study and you will was basically described while the amounts which have payment, mean that have basic departure otherwise median that have diversity. This new organization ranging from for each changeable and training get was reviewed having fun with easy linear regression. Exploratory design was developed inside multivariable analysis as well as all the variables possibly pertaining to the details get. The fresh believed level of statistical benefits try a great p-value of 0.05 otherwise faster.
Overall performance
Out of 500 women who met inclusion criteria and were invited to the study, one ong 499 women who responded to the questionnaire about knowledge of cervical cancer and screening (part II) and knowledge about HPV (part II), two did not provide personal information. So demographic data were available in only 497 women (Table 1). The mean age of 497 participants was years (SD ± ). More than half of the participants were aged < 40>
